
Dec 22, 2025
If you've been building React applications, you've likely experienced this frustration:
"React itself is wonderful, but connecting all the pieces—routing, fetching data from servers, rendering on the server-side, building APIs, and maintaining type safety—feels scattered and complicated."
TanStack Start is designed to solve exactly this problem.
Think of it this way: React handles what appears on your screen (the front-end), but modern web apps need much more. They need:
Routing (navigating between pages)
Data Fetching (getting information from a database)
Server-Side Rendering (loading pages faster on the server before sending to users)
APIs (ways for your front-end to talk to your back-end)
Type Safety (making sure your code doesn't have bugs)
TanStack Start bundles all of these together in a single, cohesive framework. It's like having a well-organized toolkit instead of hunting for different tools in different places.
TanStack Start is a full-stack React framework. This means:
| What It Does | What This Means |
|---|---|
| Full-Stack | You write both frontend (what users see) and backend (server logic) in the same project |
| Built-in Routing | Navigation between pages is built in, not added as an afterthought |
| Integrated Data Loading | Fetching data is part of your routing system, not separate |
| Server-Side Rendering (SSR) | Pages render on your server before reaching users' browsers |
| Type-Safe | TypeScript catches bugs before they reach production |
| No Lock-In | Deploy anywhere—Vercel, Netlify, your own server, serverless platforms |
TanStack Start is built on two powerful, proven technologies:
TanStack Router — Handles all your routing and data loading needs with complete type safety
Vite — A modern build tool that makes development incredibly fast (hot-reloading in milliseconds)
If you've used Next.js (another popular React framework), here's the key difference:
Next.js says: "Follow our conventions, and we'll handle everything." (Very opinionated)
TanStack Start says: "Here are powerful tools. Build your app the way you want." (Very flexible)
This makes TanStack Start ideal if you:
Want maximum control over your application structure
Don't want to be locked into one hosting platform
Need advanced type safety for large teams
Already use other TanStack libraries like TanStack Query
Creating a new TanStack Start app is straightforward:
npm create @tanstack/start@latest
cd my-app
npm install
npm run dev
That's it! Your development server is running at http://localhost:5173.
After setup, your project will look like this:
.
├── src/
│ ├── routes/
│ │ └── __root.tsx ← The main wrapper for all pages
│ ├── router.tsx ← Route configuration
│ ├── routeTree.gen.ts ← Auto-generated file (don't edit)
├── vite.config.ts ← Build configuration
├── package.json
└── tsconfig.json
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
__root.tsx | The root component that wraps all your pages. Like the main HTML template |
router.tsx | Where you define your routes and connect them together |
routeTree.gen.ts | Automatically generated—keeps your routes organized |
vite.config.ts | Configuration for fast development and optimized builds |
Here's what you need to know:
Your router.tsx file:
import { RootRoute, Router } from '@tanstack/react-router'
import Root from './routes/__root'
// Create the root route
const rootRoute = new RootRoute({
component: Root,
})
// Create your router with all routes
export const router = new Router({
routeTree: rootRoute,
})
Your __root.tsx file:
import { RootRoute } from '@tanstack/react-router'
import { Outlet } from '@tanstack/react-router'
export default function Root() {
return (
<div>
<header>My App</header>
<Outlet /> {/* This is where your pages appear */}
<footer>Footer</footer>
</div>
)
}
Now your app has a basic structure. Let's add some real functionality.
A route is essentially a page in your application. When users visit /blog, they're going to your blog route.
Here's how you create a simple blog page:
// src/routes/blog.tsx
import { createRoute } from '@tanstack/react-router'
export const BlogRoute = createRoute({
path: '/blog',
component: BlogPage,
})
function BlogPage() {
return (
<div>
<h1>Welcome to My Blog</h1>
<p>This is the blog page.</p>
</div>
)
}
When someone visits yoursite.com/blog, they'll see this page.
What if you want a route for individual blog posts, like /blog/my-first-post?
// src/routes/blog/$postId.tsx
import { createRoute } from '@tanstack/react-router'
export const BlogPostRoute = createRoute({
path: '/blog/$postId', // $postId is a dynamic part
component: BlogPostPage,
})
function BlogPostPage() {
const params = BlogPostRoute.useParams()
return (
<div>
<h1>Post: {params.postId}</h1>
<p>Content for {params.postId} goes here</p>
</div>
)
}
Now:
/blog/my-first-post shows "Post: my-first-post"
/blog/another-article shows "Post: another-article"
And so on...
Here's the magic: TypeScript knows what data is available on each route.
If you try to use params.notRealField, TypeScript will immediately tell you it doesn't exist—before you run the code. This prevents bugs that would be hard to find later.
In regular React, you often see patterns like this:
function BlogPage() {
const [posts, setPosts] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/posts')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(data => setPosts(data))
}, [])
return <div>Posts: {posts.length}</div>
}
Problems with this approach:
Data loads after the page renders (users see a blank page first)
The same API call might happen multiple times
Hard to know if data is ready or still loading
No type safety for the API response
In TanStack Start, each route can have a loader function that runs before the page renders:
// src/routes/blog.tsx
import { createRoute } from '@tanstack/react-router'
export const BlogRoute = createRoute({
path: '/blog',
// This loader runs BEFORE the page renders
loader: async () => {
const response = await fetch('/api/posts')
return response.json()
},
component: BlogPage,
})
function BlogPage() {
// TypeScript knows exactly what 'posts' is
const posts = BlogRoute.useLoaderData()
return (
<div>
<h1>My Blog</h1>
{posts.map(post => (
<article key={post.id}>
<h2>{post.title}</h2>
<p>{post.content}</p>
</article>
))}
</div>
)
}
| Feature | Traditional React | TanStack Start Loaders |
|---|---|---|
| When Data Loads | After page renders (slower) | Before page renders (faster) |
| Type Safety | You guess the shape | TypeScript knows exactly |
| Multiple Calls | Can happen by accident | Prevented by design |
| User Experience | Flash of blank page | Full content immediately |
Here's a real-world example showing why loaders are powerful:
// src/routes/blog/$postId.tsx
export const BlogPostRoute = createRoute({
path: '/blog/$postId',
loader: async ({ params }) => {
// Get both post and comments in parallel
const [postRes, commentsRes] = await Promise.all([
fetch(`/api/posts/${params.postId}`),
fetch(`/api/posts/${params.postId}/comments`)
])
return {
post: await postRes.json(),
comments: await commentsRes.json(),
}
},
component: BlogPostPage,
})
function BlogPostPage() {
const { post, comments } = BlogPostRoute.useLoaderData()
return (
<article>
<h1>{post.title}</h1>
<p>{post.content}</p>
<section>
<h2>Comments ({comments.length})</h2>
{comments.map(comment => (
<div key={comment.id}>{comment.text}</div>
))}
</section>
</article>
)
}
What happens:
User navigates to /blog/my-post
TanStack Start calls your loader
Loader fetches post data AND comments in parallel (fast!)
Component renders with all data ready
User never sees a loading state—everything appears at once
Normally, when you visit a website:
Browser downloads HTML (mostly empty)
Browser downloads JavaScript
JavaScript runs and fills in the content
User finally sees the page (takes time!)
With Server-Side Rendering (SSR):
Server prepares all the content
Server sends complete HTML to browser
User sees the page immediately
| Metric | Without SSR | With SSR |
|---|---|---|
| Time to See Content | Slower | Much faster |
| Search Engine Rankings | Worse (search bots see blank page) | Better |
| Mobile Experience | Poor on slow networks | Good even on slow networks |
| User Satisfaction | Users see loading states | Users see instant content |
TanStack Start supports streaming SSR, which means:
1. Server starts rendering immediately
2. Browser receives HTML in chunks
3. User sees content as it arrives
4. JavaScript loads in the background
5. Page becomes fully interactive
Real-world example:
User opens your blog
Title and first post appear instantly (from server)
Comments load as server fetches them
User can start reading while comments are still loading
Page feels instant, even though data is loading
Normally, if you need backend logic (like saving to a database), you must:
Build an API endpoint (separate folder, separate file)
Write TypeScript types for the request
Write TypeScript types for the response
Call it from your component
Handle errors
This is a lot of boilerplate!
TanStack Start lets you write backend logic right next to your component code:
// src/routes/blog/$postId.tsx
import { createServerFn } from '@tanstack/start'
// This runs ONLY on the server
export const saveComment = createServerFn('POST', async (comment: string) => {
// This code never runs in the browser
// You can safely use database credentials, secrets, etc.
const db = await getDatabase()
const result = await db.comments.create({
text: comment,
createdAt: new Date(),
})
return result
})
function BlogPostPage() {
const [comment, setComment] = useState('')
const handleSaveComment = async () => {
// Call the server function from your component
const result = await saveComment(comment)
console.log('Comment saved:', result)
}
return (
<div>
<textarea
value={comment}
onChange={(e) => setComment(e.target.value)}
/>
<button onClick={handleSaveComment}>Save Comment</button>
</div>
)
}
TypeScript automatically knows that saveComment takes a string and returns a comment object
The function runs on the server, never in the browser (your database credentials are safe)
One file, one function definition (no separate API routes)
Automatic serialization (your data is converted between server and browser automatically)
Server functions are perfect for:
| Use Case | Example |
|---|---|
| Forms | Save form data to database when user submits |
| Authentication | Login, logout, permission checks |
| Database Queries | Fetch data securely (don't expose database queries to browser) |
| File Processing | Process uploaded images or documents |
| External APIs | Call payment processors, email services (keep API keys safe) |
| Heavy Computations | Process large datasets on powerful server, not user's device |
| Feature | TanStack Start | Next.js |
|---|---|---|
| Routing System | Code-based, fully typed | File-based, convention-driven |
| Type Safety | Excellent across all layers | Good, but less comprehensive |
| Build Tool | Vite (super fast) | Webpack/Turbopack |
| Server-Side Rendering | Streaming SSR, per-route control | SSR + ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) |
| Flexibility | Very high, you control structure | Opinionated, less flexibility |
| Ecosystem | Growing, but smaller | Massive, tons of plugins |
| Learning Curve | Steeper (need to understand routing) | Gentler (folder structure is intuitive) |
| Platform Lock-In | None (deploy anywhere) | Works best with Vercel |
| Community Size | Growing | Very large |
| Official Plugins | Limited | Extensive |
| Beginner Friendly | Better for experienced developers | Better for beginners |
✅ Want the absolute best type safety for routing and data flowing through your app
✅ Need complete freedom over deployment (your own server, serverless, edge functions)
✅ Want fine-grained control over when and where server-side rendering happens
✅ Already use other TanStack libraries (TanStack Query, TanStack Table)
✅ Are comfortable with React and TypeScript
✅ Value developer experience and fast build times (Vite)
✅ Want to avoid being locked into Vercel's ecosystem
✅ Want a framework that works great right out of the box for most use cases
✅ Are deploying to Vercel (the creators of Next.js)
✅ Need access to React Server Components (they were pioneered by Next.js)
✅ Want the biggest ecosystem of plugins, templates, and community examples
✅ Prefer "convention over configuration" (files in specific folders automatically become routes)
✅ Are new to full-stack React development
✅ Need advanced features like image optimization built in
// Your router is fully typed
// Your routes are fully typed
// Your loaders are fully typed
// Your server functions are fully typed
// TypeScript catches errors BEFORE runtime
Real benefit: In a team of 5 developers, type safety prevents countless bugs and makes refactoring safe. When one developer changes an API response format, TypeScript tells every other developer that their code needs updating.
Unlike Next.js, which says "routes go in /pages or /app", TanStack Start says "organize however makes sense for your app."
Want to co-locate components with routes? ✅
Want a separate components folder? ✅
Want utility functions next to your routes? ✅
Want a monorepo structure? ✅
Data doesn't get scattered across your app:
Old way: Data fetched in useEffect, passed as props down a component tree
TanStack way: Data lives with the route, accessed where needed
This makes debugging easier because you always know where data comes from.
Deploy your TanStack Start app to:
Vercel ✅
Netlify ✅
Your own Node.js server ✅
Cloudflare Workers ✅
AWS Lambda ✅
Deno Deploy ✅
You're not trapped. Switch hosting providers anytime.
Vite makes development incredibly fast (changes appear instantly)
Full TypeScript support everywhere (not just parts of your app)
One cohesive system (no jumping between routing, API files, and components)
Next.js has been around longer and has:
More pre-built templates
More community examples
More third-party integrations
More blog posts and tutorials
If you get stuck, Stack Overflow might not have an answer yet (though the TanStack Discord community is helpful).
If you're coming from Next.js, file-based routing feels intuitive:
/pages/blog.tsx → yoursite.com/blog
/pages/blog/[id].tsx → yoursite.com/blog/123
TanStack Start requires you to explicitly define routes in code, which takes getting used to. It's not harder—just different.
TanStack Start is still being actively developed. While it's stable for production use, expect:
API changes (though unlikely to be breaking)
New features being added
Occasional tweaks to how things work
This isn't bad—it means the framework is improving. But if you need absolute stability, Next.js is more mature.
TanStack Start assumes you already know:
React hooks and components
TypeScript basics
How async/await works
Client vs. server concepts
If you're brand new to React, Next.js might be an easier entry point.
| Project Type | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Personal blog or small site | Next.js | Easier setup, more examples online |
| Corporate SaaS product | TanStack Start | Better type safety, full control |
| Startup MVP | Next.js | Faster to market with conventions |
| Large team project | TanStack Start | Type safety prevents team bugs |
| Deploy to Vercel | Next.js | Native integration |
| Deploy to custom infrastructure | TanStack Start | Complete freedom |
| Learning React | Next.js | Gentler learning curve |
| Expert developers | TanStack Start | Leverages your skills |
Create a test project:
npm create @tanstack/start@latest my-test-app
cd my-test-app
npm install
npm run dev
Read the official docs:
Visit tanstack.com/start
Check the routing guide
Explore server functions
Build something small:
A todo list (learn routing basics)
A blog (learn data loaders)
A contact form (learn server functions)
Join the community:
TanStack Discord for questions
GitHub discussions for feedback
| Resource | Best For |
|---|---|
| Official Docs | Understanding how TanStack Start works |
| Discord Community | Getting help from other developers |
| GitHub Issues | Reporting bugs or requesting features |
| Example Projects | Seeing real-world implementations |
TanStack Start is excellent if:
You're building a serious, scalable application
You want maximum type safety
You value developer experience and flexibility
You're comfortable with React and TypeScript
You don't want to be locked into one hosting platform
Next.js is better if:
You want the easiest path to a working app
You're deploying to Vercel
You're new to full-stack development
You want the biggest ecosystem
The good news? Both are modern, production-ready frameworks. You can't go wrong—it depends on your specific needs and preferences.
| Term | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Routing | How your app navigates between different pages |
| Server-Side Rendering (SSR) | Rendering your page on the server before sending to browser |
| Type Safety | TypeScript catching errors before they become bugs |
| Loader | A function that runs before a page renders to load necessary data |
| Server Function | Backend logic that runs on the server, not the browser |
| Type-Safe | Your code catches mistakes automatically before running |
| Streaming | Sending content in chunks instead of all at once |
| Vite | A fast build tool for modern web development |
| Ecosystem | The community, plugins, and tools built around a framework |
| Lock-In | Being forced to use one company's platform (vendor lock-in) |
This guide explains TanStack Start in a way that bridges the gap between complete beginners and advanced developers. Use this as a reference when learning the framework, and refer back to specific sections as needed.

29 Dec 2025
Node.js vs Python: Which is Better for Back-End Development?

25 Dec 2025
Top 5 Animated UI Component Libraries for Frontend Developers

24 Dec 2025
Why Most Modern Apps use Kafka